GLEC Framework
The GLEC Framework is the Smart Freight Centre's method for calculating and reporting logistics greenhouse gas emissions across every mode, from trucks to ships, planes and logistics hubs. Version 3.2, published in October 2025, folds in ISO 14083, counts emissions well-to-wheel, and asks for both total emissions and emission intensity in CO2e per tonne-kilometre.
What it asks for
- Well-to-wheel: like ISO 14083, version 3 is built on the well-to-wheel concept, so producing the fuel counts as well as burning it.
- Two numbers: total GHG emissions, and emission intensity as mass of CO2e per tonne-km.
- Primary data whenever possible — measured fuel and distance. The framework calls its own default factors best-case approximations of the actual situation.
- Anyone in the chain: shippers, carriers and logistics service providers can all implement it, the Smart Freight Centre says.
Default intensities by mode
| Mode | Region | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy goods vehicle over 20 t, no temperature control | Europe and South America | 125 |
| Truckload dry van (SmartWay category) | North America | 93 |
| Less-than-truckload dry van (SmartWay category) | North America | 218 |
| Rail, traction type unknown | EU average | 18.4 |
| Rail, diesel | US average | 16.1 |
| Rail, diesel and electric | India average | 10.6 |
| Air freighter, long haul over 1,500 km | Air sector default | 608 |
Worked example: the fuel-based method
100,000 litres of diesel with 5% biodiesel, burned in Europe × 3.36 kg CO2e per litre (well-to-wheel) = 336,000 kg = 336 t CO2eThe framework's own example. The factor is regional and blend-specific: the UK government's 2026 forecourt diesel is 3.19 kg a litre well-to-wheel, so a report names the factor it used.
The framework says it is recognised by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and is the recommended method for reporting logistics emissions to CDP, the Carbon Disclosure Project. It covers the transport itself as well as logistics hubs, and its North American road defaults are based on SmartWay categories, so a carrier's region decides which default applies.
The mistake people make
Two, both named in the framework. One is substituting a tank-to-wheel value where a well-to-wheel one belongs: on UK 2026 diesel factors, that drops about a fifth of the emissions. The other is failing to include emissions from empty running — a truck that returns empty burned that fuel for the load it delivered, and leaving the return leg out makes the lane look cleaner than it is.
FAQ
GLEC Framework: common questions
- Is the GLEC Framework the same as ISO 14083?
- They now agree: version 3.2 integrates the provisions of ISO 14083:2023, and both are built on well-to-wheel emissions. ISO 14083 is the international standard; GLEC adds default factors, worked examples and guidance for each mode.
- Who uses the GLEC Framework?
- Shippers, carriers and logistics service providers, according to the Smart Freight Centre. It is the method CDP recommends for reporting logistics emissions, and the framework says the Greenhouse Gas Protocol recognises it.
- Can I report using GLEC default factors?
- Where measured data is missing. The framework asks for primary data whenever possible and calls its defaults best-case approximations, so a report built on defaults should say so and move to measured fuel over time.
Sources
- GLEC Framework for logistics emissions accounting and reporting, v3.2 — Smart Freight Centre, October 2025
- GLEC Framework v3.2 — Smart Freight Centre, October 2025
- Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2026, full set — DESNZ, June 2026
Related terms
- Emission intensity (freight)Term
- Well-to-wheel (WTW) emissionsTerm
- Scope 3 transport emissionsTerm
- EPA SmartWayTerm
- Book and claimTerm
- DeadheadTerm
On Traqo: Truck Utilisation Calculator shows what share of a truck's payload and volume a load fills.
_1777711377206.png)